MJIS

Prevalence of Non Strbismic Binocular Vision Disorders in Patients with Asthenopia

Diwakar Rao

  • Download PDF
  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/jmrh.2014.11003
KEYWORDS

Asthenopia, Prevalence, Non strabismic binocular vision disorders, Orthoptic evaluation

PUBLISHED DATE
PUBLISHER
ABSTRACT

Non strabismic binocular vision disorders are highly prevalent conditions. Patients report to eye care practitioners with symptoms of eyestrain, headaches, blurred vision etc. These conditions are generally missed out unless a complete orthoptic and binocular vision examination is performed. Treatment of these conditions is very successful with vision therapy, lenses and prisms. Successful treatment leads to a significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients. This study was aimed towards finding the prevalence of non strabismic binocular vision disorders in patients complaining of asthenopia.

Page(s)
URL http://dspace.chitkara.edu.in/jspui/bitstream/1/572/3/11003_JMRH_Diwakar.pdf
ISSN
DOI https://doi.org/10.15415/jmrh.2014.11003
REFERENCES
  • Cooper J. Drugs that may affect accommodative function [Appendix 15]. In: Amos JF, ed. Diagnosis and management in vision care. Boston: Butterworths, 1987:455-9.
  • Scheiman M, Gallaway M, Coulter R, Reinstein F, Ciner E, Herzberg C, Parisi M. Prevalence of vision and ocular disease conditions in a clinical pediatric population. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67:193-202.
  • Logan NS, Gilmartin B. School vision screening, ages 5-16 years: the evidence-base for content, provision and efficacy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:481-492.
  • Abdi S, Rydberg A. Asthenopia in schoolchildren, orthoptic and ophthalmological findings and treatment. Doc Ophthalmol. 2005;111:65-72.
  • Borsting E, Rouse M, Deland P, Hovett S, Kimura D, Park M, et al. Association of symptoms and convergence and accommodative insuffi ciency in school-age children. Optometry. 2003;74:25-34.
  • Dwyer P. The prevalence of vergence accommodation disorders in a school-age population. Clinical & Experimental Optometry. 1992;75:10-18.
  • Lara F, Cacho P, García A, Megías R. General binocular disorders: prevalence in a clinic population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:70-74.
  • Letourneau J, Duci S. Prevalence of convergence insuffi ciency among elementary school children. Can J Optom. 1988;50:194-197.
  • Pickwell L, Viggars M, Jenkins T. Convergence insuffi ciency in a rural population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6:339-341.
  • Rouse M, Hyman L, Hussein M, Solan H. Frequency of convergence insufficiency in optometry clinic settings. Convergence Insuffi ciency and Reading Study (CIRS) Group. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:88-96.
  • Rouse M, Borsting E, Hyman L, Hussein M, Cotter S, Flynn M, et al. Frequency of convergence insuffi ciency among fi fth and sixth graders. The Convergence Insuffi ciency and Reading Study (CIRS) group. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:643-649.
  • Anton A, Andrada MT, Mayo A, Portela J, Merayo J. Epidemiology of refractive errors in an adult European population: the Segovia study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16: 231-237.
  • Dirani M, Chan YH, Gazzard G, Hornbeak DM, Leo SW, Selvaraj P, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1348-1355.
  • Nangia V, Jonas JB, Sinha A, Matin A, Kulkarni M. Refractive error in central India: the Central India Eye and Medical Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:693-699.