Comparison of Stereopsis, Contrast Sensitivity and Near Points of Accommodation In Patients With Degree of Myopia

Abstract

Background: Stereopsis is the ability to perceive depth in objects through binocular vision, where the brain interprets 2-dimensional retinal images as 3-dimensional shadows. It plays a crucial role in assessing and understanding the objects we see. Factors like sensory and motor fusion greatly influence the quality of stereoscopic vision. Myopia, a condition characterized by nearsightedness, can negatively impact stereopsis. Contrast sensitivity refers to the ability to discern sharp outlines and detect subtle differences in shading and patterns. It helps identify objects with unclear boundaries against their background.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare Stereopsis, Contrast Sensitivity, and Near Point of Accommodation among individuals with different grades of Myopia and Emmetropia.

Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at Nandadeep Eye Hospital, Maharastra, involving staff and patients aged 15 to 30 years. Participants with strabismus, anisometropia, previous ocular surgery, ocular diseases, or systemic conditions were excluded. The assessments included objective and subjective refraction eye examinations, as well as measurements of stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and near point of accommodation. Results: The results, based on 109 subjects, indicated no significant change in contrast sensitivity between emmetropes and myopes. However, there were significant differences in stereoacuity and NPA among different grades of myopes compared to emmetropes.

Conclusions: the study suggests that optometrists and eye healthcare professionals should assess stereopsis and near point of accommodation in severely myopic patients even after optical correction, and consider vision therapy if necessary, as it is an effective treatment for accommodative and binocular vision anomalies.

  • Page Number : 53-58

  • Published Date : 2021-04-14

  • Keywords
    Myopia, Stereopsis, Contrast Sensitivity, Accommodation, Royal Air Force Ruler, Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart

  • DOI Number
    10.15415/jmrh.2021.72005

  • Authors
    Sachitanand Singh Renu Thakur Diksha Kumari Prachi Yadav Bipina Gautam

References

  • Ahmadi, F., Mirzajani, A., Jafarzadehpur, E., Khabazkhoob, M., & Amini Vishteh, R. (2018). The Evaluation of Stereopsis and Its Correlation with Refractive Errors in Iranian 7-Year-Old Schoolchildren. Function and Disability Journal, 1(3), 27-32.
  • Chanchal G., Anamika A., Darshana R, Anuja Gharat, Amruta K4 , Aditi A. (2017). A study of stereopsis in children and adolescents with myopic refractive error. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 4(1), 221-224.
  • Duane, A. (1922). Studies in monocular and binocular accommodation with their clinical applications. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 5(11), 865-877.
  • García-Muñoz, Á., Carbonell-Bonete, S., & Cacho- Martínez, P. (2014). Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies. Journal of Optometry, 7(4), 178-192.
  • Gwiazda, J., Bauer, J., Thorn, F., & Held, R. (1995). A dynamic relationship between myopia and blurdriven accommodation in school-aged children. Visionresearch, 35(9), 1299-1304.
  • Gwiazda, J., Thorn, F., Bauer, J., & Held, R. (1993). Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 34(3), 690-694.
  • Jindra, L. F., & Zemon, V. (1989). Contrast sensitivity testing: a more complete assessment of vision. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 15(2), 141-148.
  • Khurana, A. K., Khurana, A. K., & Khurana, B. (2014). Theory and practice of optics and refraction. Elsevier India.
  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
  • Kuang, T. M., Hsu, W. M., Chou, C. K., Tsai, S. Y., & Chou, P. (2005). Impact of stereopsis on quality of life. Eye, 19(5), 540-545.
  • Leat, S. J., Chan, L. L. L., Maharaj, P. D., Hrynchak, P. K., Mittelstaedt, A., Machan, C. M., & Irving, E. L. (2013). Binocular vision and eye movement disorders in older adults. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 54(5), 3798-3805.
  • Liou, S. W., & Chiu, C. J. (2001). Myopia and contrast sensitivity function. Current eye research, 22(2), 81-84.
  • Rehmat, M., Zahid, M., Imtiaz, H., Mudassar, A., Zahid, Q., & Anjum, M. (2023). Stereoacuity in Varying Degrees of Myopia Before and After Correction. Annals of Punjab Medical College (APMC), 17(3), 302-305.
  • Saputra, D., Amra, A. A., & Aldy, F. (2018). Relationship Between Degree of Myopia and Stereoscopic Vision in Junior High School Students. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8, 12.
  • Scheiman, M., & Wick, B. (2008). Clinical management of binocular vision: heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movement disorders. Fourth edition, chapter 1, 16-17, 164-165 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Stoimenova, B. D. (2007). The effect of myopia on contrast thresholds. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 48(5), 2371-2374.
  • Sukha, A. Y., & Rubin, A. (2013). Psychophysical aspects of contrast sensitivity. African Vision and Eye Health, 72(2), 76-85.
  • Vera-Diaz, F. A., Bex, P. J., Ferreira, A., & Kosovicheva, A. (2018). Binocular temporal visual processing in myopia. Journal of vision, 18(11), 17-17.
  • Waugh, A., & Grant, A. (2014). Ross & Wilson Anatomy and physiology in health and illness E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.