Biological Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal Oncology: Have We Reached a Turning Point?
Home >
2025,
Vol. 12 No. 1 > Biological Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal Oncology: Have We Reached a Turning Point?
Published: May 30, 2026 | Views: 33
Authors
Ashish Gulia
Keywords
Human action recognition, 3D skeletal data, Deep learning, Graph convolutional networks, Metaheuristic optimization, Spatiotemporal modeling, Hybrid neural networks, Transformer-based models
Abstract
In the field of musculoskeletal oncology, there has been a shift in ideology from local management of tumours with amputations to limb salvage surgery. Musculoskeletal oncology entered a new age of limb salvage due to advances in the fields of chemotherapy and radiation oncology, as well as in alloys, metals, and composites (Shojaie et al., 2023; Andrade et al., 2016). However, limb salvage is indicated only when we can achieve R0 margins and ensure that the major neurovascular structures remain uninvolved or reconstructible; salvage at all costs is a fallacy. Extensive soft tissue loss or a limb rendered insensate and ischemic is a contraindication to limb salvage surgery, where amputation would be a better functional choice.
The “void” left behind after the resection of the diseased bone was filled with a metallic prosthesis. This gave our patients almost immediate freedom of motion, a stark contrast to the older philosophy of amputation/disarticulation. However, this came at a cost; we are not gods to provide bountiful gifts that last forever. The bones we replaced with metal had an expiration date, as initial results were good but were associated with multiple complications. We were essentially placing a mechanical part into a biological system and hoping the two would coexist. Hence, we argue that we have reached a definitive turning point and are moving out of the “Age of Mechanics” and into the “Age of Biologics.” Can we consider one method as superior to the other?
References
- Andrade, F., Teixeira, M. J. D., Araújo, L. H. D. C., & Ponte, C. E. B. (2016). Knee bone tumors: Findings on conventional radiology. Radiologia Brasileira, 49(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.0007
- Grimer, R. J., Aydin, B. K., Wafa, H., Carter, S. R., Jeys, L., Abudu, A., & Parry, M. (2016). Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone. The Bone & Joint Journal, 98(6), 857–864. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.37417
- Jeys, L., & Grimer, R. (2009). The long-term risks of infection and amputation with limb salvage surgery using endoprostheses. In Treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas (pp. 75–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77960-5_7
- Puri, A. (2021). Musculoskeletal oncology reconstructions in India–Changes in this millennium! Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 20, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.06.003
- Shankhdhar, V. K., Yadav, P. S., Puri, A., Kasat, A., Dushyant, J., Raghu, R. B. N., & Gulia, A. (2018). Free fibula flap for lower limb salvage after tumour resection. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 51(03), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_113_17
- Shojaie, P., Afzali, M., Nischal, N., Iyengar, K. P., Yousef, M. M. A., & Botchu, R. (2023). Bone tumor imaging: An update on modalities and radiological findings. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 10(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.4103/jajs.jajs_31_23
- Tiwari, A., Mehta, S., Sharma, S. K., Chauhan, V., Rohela, H., & Arora, R. (2019). Vascularized fibula with and without extracorporeal radiotherapy for limb salvage surgery in Indian patients. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 10(1), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.003
How to Cite
Ashish Gulia . Biological Reconstruction in Musculoskeletal Oncology: Have We Reached a Turning Point?.
J. Multidiscip. Res. Healthcare. 2025, 12, 100-102
Search
